Munger-style inversion review
OfficialOfficial · updated Nov 4, 2026 · v1.0.2
Reviews a plan by inversion: lists how it would surely fail, separates what the business couldn't survive, and checks it through several models, from ideas Charlie Munger described.
Sign up free to add this skill to your pod
You come back here after you sign in, and add it with one click.
When to use it
- Before committing to a plan, a launch, a large contract or a purchase
- A goal everyone agreed on too quickly and nobody has stress-tested
What you give it
- The plan, goal and success measure
- Key facts: money, people, dependencies
- What the team already worries about
- Consequences the business could not survive
What you get
A table of specific failure modes with mechanisms, the places never to go with a rule for each, a multi-model read, and the plan changes with owners.
Changelog
- v1.0.2 · Nov 4, 2026 · Description: a lowercase letter mid-sentence.
- v1.0.1 · Nov 4, 2026 · Example output now opens with the attribution and not-affiliated lines, as the skill's own checks require.
- v1.0.0 · Nov 4, 2026 · First release.
Sources
- Poor Charlie's Almanack - Stripe Press (2026-11-04)
- Berkshire Hathaway 1996 shareholder letter (Charlie's dictum, inverting) (2026-11-04)
- Berkshire Hathaway 2023 shareholder letter (Charlie's 1965 advice) (2026-11-04)
Related skills
- Decision memo Writes a short narrative decision memo: recommendation first, context, options with trade-offs, risks, and the ask with a decider and deadline.
- A/B test plan Writes an A/B test brief: hypothesis, primary and guardrail metrics, MDE, sample size and duration with the math, stop rules, and a decision rule set in advance.
- Buffett-style moat and margin-of-safety check Checks a business or a purchase for an enduring moat, a known circle of competence and a margin of safety, as Warren Buffett describes them in the Berkshire letters. Not investment advice.
- Financial model assumptions review Reviews a financial model's assumptions: lists each with its source, tests sensitivity, checks plausibility against history, and names the 3 that matter.